Calif-Asia Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Calif-Asia Co. v. United States

32 Cust. Ct. 408, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1841

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedFebruary 17, 1954

DocketNo. 57860; protests 77148-K, etc. (Los Angeles)

StatusPublished

This text of 32 Cust. Ct. 408 (Calif-Asia Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Calif-Asia Co. v. United States, 32 Cust. Ct. 408, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1841 (cusc 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

[409]*409Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the two classes of merchandise are the same in all material respects as those involved in Calif-Asia Co., Ltd. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 133, C. A. D. 475). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited decision, the items marked “A” were held dutiable at 40 percent ad valorem under paragraph 412, and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at 25 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the trade agreement with the United Kingdom (T. D. 49753).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[409]*409Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the two classes of merchandise are the same in all material respects as those involved in Calif-Asia Co., Ltd. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 133, C. A. D. 475). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited decision, the items marked “A” were held dutiable at 40 percent ad valorem under paragraph 412, and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at 25 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the trade agreement with the United Kingdom (T. D. 49753).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 Cust. Ct. 408, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calif-asia-co-v-united-states-cusc-1954.