Calichio v. Calichio

96 A. 658, 85 N.J. Eq. 213, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 427
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 15, 1915
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 96 A. 658 (Calichio v. Calichio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Calichio v. Calichio, 96 A. 658, 85 N.J. Eq. 213, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 427 (N.J. 1915).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Advisory Master Eoe.

For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Vredenburgh, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor—13. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Godfrey v. Godfrey
1 N.E.2d 777 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 A. 658, 85 N.J. Eq. 213, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calichio-v-calichio-nj-1915.