Calichio v. Calichio

96 A. 658, 85 N.J. Eq. 213, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 427
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 15, 1915·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Advisory Master Eoe.

For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Vredenburgh, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor—13. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Calichio v. Calichio, 96 A. 658, 85 N.J. Eq. 213, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 427 (N.J. 1915).

96 A. 658 (Calichio v. Calichio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Godfrey v. Godfrey
1 N.E.2d 777 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1936)