Cali v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Cali v. State

173 So. 346, 127 Fla. 492, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1475

DecidedMarch 22, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 173 So. 346 (Cali v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cali v. State, 173 So. 346, 127 Fla. 492, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1475 (Fla. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case is before us on motion of the defendant in error to affirm the judgment on the record because plaintiff in error has not filed a brief in the Supreme Court on the merits of the case. Amended Rule 20. provides, in part as follows:

“When no brief has been filed by the plaintiff in error or appellant, within the time required by, or in accordance with, the rules hereinbefore set forth, the cause may be disihissed or costs imposed upon the party thus-in default, upon motion of the defendant in error or appellee or by the *493 court o'f its own motion, or the judgment may be affirmed, unless; upon motion, for good cause shown, the court sees fit to permit additional time for the amendment of briefs filed or the filing of new briefs, in compliance with the requirements of the foregoing rules.”

We have examined the record and, being advised of our opinion and judgment to be given in this regard, find that “according to the right of the case” the judgment should be affirmed and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case is before us on motion of the defendant in error to affirm the judgment on the record because plaintiff in error has not filed a brief in the Supreme Court on the merits of the case. Amended Rule 20. provides, in part as follows:

“When no brief has been filed by the plaintiff in error or appellant, within the time required by, or in accordance with, the rules hereinbefore set forth, the cause may be disihissed or costs imposed upon the party thus-in default, upon motion of the defendant in error or appellee or by the *493 court o'f its own motion, or the judgment may be affirmed, unless; upon motion, for good cause shown, the court sees fit to permit additional time for the amendment of briefs filed or the filing of new briefs, in compliance with the requirements of the foregoing rules.”

We have examined the record and, being advised of our opinion and judgment to be given in this regard, find that “according to the right of the case” the judgment should be affirmed and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 So. 346, 127 Fla. 492, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cali-v-state-fla-1937.