Cali v. Savino

127 A.D.3d 404, 4 N.Y.S.3d 499
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 2, 2015
Docket14693 304456/13
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 127 A.D.3d 404 (Cali v. Savino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cali v. Savino, 127 A.D.3d 404, 4 N.Y.S.3d 499 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx *405 County (Wilma Guzman, J.), entered March 7, 2014, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied.

The fiduciary duty claims here sound in fraud, and thus the two year discovery rule of CPLR 213 (8) applies to this action (see Kaufman v Cohen, 307 AD2d 113, 122 [1st Dept 2003]). Under the circumstances of this case, and at this pleading stage, it was error for the IAS court to conclude as a matter of law that the case was barred by the statute of limitations.

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.R, Sweeny, DeGrasse, Feinman and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Glyka Trans, LLC v. City of New York
2018 NY Slip Op 3129 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 A.D.3d 404, 4 N.Y.S.3d 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cali-v-savino-nyappdiv-2015.