Calhoun v. State
This text of 171 S.E. 304 (Calhoun v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The exception to the testimony in reference to the employment of the defendant by the bank is without merit. His own statement shows that he was a “de facto” employee. Especially is the above true where the full details in reference to such employment were shown to the jury.
2. The court properly admitted the other evidence to which objection was made.
3. The charge of the court fully and fairly presented the issues of the case to the jury, and the exceptions thereto are not well taken.
4. The corpus delicti was proven; a confession by the defendant was shown, and the corroboration thereof was amply sufficient to support the verdict. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
171 S.E. 304, 47 Ga. App. 702, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calhoun-v-state-gactapp-1933.