Calhoun v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Calhoun v. State

259 S.W.3d 455, 370 Ark. 369, 2007 Ark. LEXIS 381

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJune 21, 2007

DocketCR 07-566

StatusPublished

This text of 259 S.W.3d 455 (Calhoun v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Calhoun v. State, 259 S.W.3d 455, 370 Ark. 369, 2007 Ark. LEXIS 381 (Ark. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant Etoy Calhoun, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. His attorney, F. Wilson Bynum, Jr., Public Defender for the Eleventh Judicial District-West, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

Because Bynum has admitted fault, this motion is granted pursuant to McDonald v. State, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883 (2004). A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant Etoy Calhoun, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. His attorney, F. Wilson Bynum, Jr., Public Defender for the Eleventh Judicial District-West, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

Because Bynum has admitted fault, this motion is granted pursuant to McDonald v. State, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883 (2004). A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 S.W.3d 455, 370 Ark. 369, 2007 Ark. LEXIS 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calhoun-v-state-ark-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack