Calhoun v. Southern States Naval Stores Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Calhoun v. Southern States Naval Stores Co.

194 S.E. 191, 185 Ga. 153, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 690

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 15, 1937

DocketNo. 11930

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 194 S.E. 191 (Calhoun v. Southern States Naval Stores Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Calhoun v. Southern States Naval Stores Co., 194 S.E. 191, 185 Ga. 153, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 690 (Ga. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Hutcheson, Justice.

“A writing purporting to be a certificate approving tbe recitals in a bill of exceptions, but fatally defective by reason of the fact that the judge does not unqualifiedly certify that the recitals of fact contained in the bill of exceptions' are true, is absolutely void, and, in legal potency and effect in the creation of a writ of error, amounts to no more than a refusal by the judge to affix his name to the certificate which constitutes a writ of error.” Barker v. Peoples Loan & Savings Co., 178 Ga. 464 (173 S. E. 704) ; Eady v. Magnolia Cemetery Co., 175 Ga. 787 (166 S. E. 436), and cit.; Cady v. Cady, 161 Ga. 556 (131 S. E. 282), and cit. In the light of the foregoing cases, the writ of error in the instant case is defective, and therefore, on motion, it is dismissed. The second certificate to the writ of error was not made until after the expiration of the time in which the plaintiffs in error could except. See Cartledge v. Ashford, 148 Ga. 589 (97 S. E. 521).

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Bell, J., absent beocmse of illness. P. M. Mosley and William B. Kent & Son, for plaintiffs. Travis & Travis, Dallam B. Jaclcson and Will Stallings, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hutcheson, Justice.

“A writing purporting to be a certificate approving tbe recitals in a bill of exceptions, but fatally defective by reason of the fact that the judge does not unqualifiedly certify that the recitals of fact contained in the bill of exceptions' are true, is absolutely void, and, in legal potency and effect in the creation of a writ of error, amounts to no more than a refusal by the judge to affix his name to the certificate which constitutes a writ of error.” Barker v. Peoples Loan & Savings Co., 178 Ga. 464 (173 S. E. 704) ; Eady v. Magnolia Cemetery Co., 175 Ga. 787 (166 S. E. 436), and cit.; Cady v. Cady, 161 Ga. 556 (131 S. E. 282), and cit. In the light of the foregoing cases, the writ of error in the instant case is defective, and therefore, on motion, it is dismissed. The second certificate to the writ of error was not made until after the expiration of the time in which the plaintiffs in error could except. See Cartledge v. Ashford, 148 Ga. 589 (97 S. E. 521).

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Bell, J., absent beocmse of illness. P. M. Mosley and William B. Kent & Son, for plaintiffs. Travis & Travis, Dallam B. Jaclcson and Will Stallings, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 S.E. 191, 185 Ga. 153, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calhoun-v-southern-states-naval-stores-co-ga-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack