Calhoun v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.

Fifth Circuit

Calhoun v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.

121 F. 1018, 57 C.C.A. 327, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4714

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 7, 1903·No. No. 1,214·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For reasons given by Judge Newman ([C. C.] 120 Fed. 513) found in the transcript, and on the further ground of laches (see McLaughlin v. People’s Railway Co. [C. C.] 21 Fed. 574; Woodmance & Hewitt Mfg. Co. v. Williams, 15 C. C. A. 720, 68 Fed. 489; Richardson v. Osborne & Co., 36 C. C. A. 610, 93 Fed. 828; Covert v. Travers Bros. [C. C.] 96 Fed. 568), the decree appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

For reasons given by Judge Newman ([C. C.] 120 Fed. 513) found in the transcript, and on the further ground of laches (see McLaughlin v. People’s Railway Co. [C. C.] 21 Fed. 574; Woodmance & Hewitt Mfg. Co. v. Williams, 15 C. C. A. 720, 68 Fed. 489; Richardson v. Osborne & Co., 36 C. C. A. 610, 93 Fed. 828; Covert v. Travers Bros. [C. C.] 96 Fed. 568), the decree appealed from is affirmed.

Calhoun v. Southern Cotton Oil Co., 121 F. 1018, 57 C.C.A. 327, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4714 (5th Cir. 1903).

Pincite

121 F. 1018 (Calhoun v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related