Calhoun v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.

Fifth Circuit

Calhoun v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.

121 F. 1018, 57 C.C.A. 327, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4714

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 7, 1903

DocketNo. 1,214

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 121 F. 1018 (Calhoun v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Calhoun v. Southern Cotton Oil Co., 121 F. 1018, 57 C.C.A. 327, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4714 (5th Cir. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For reasons given by Judge Newman ([C. C.] 120 Fed. 513) found in the transcript, and on the further ground of laches (see McLaughlin v. People’s Railway Co. [C. C.] 21 Fed. 574; Woodmance & Hewitt Mfg. Co. v. Williams, 15 C. C. A. 720, 68 Fed. 489; Richardson v. Osborne & Co., 36 C. C. A. 610, 93 Fed. 828; Covert v. Travers Bros. [C. C.] 96 Fed. 568), the decree appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

For reasons given by Judge Newman ([C. C.] 120 Fed. 513) found in the transcript, and on the further ground of laches (see McLaughlin v. People’s Railway Co. [C. C.] 21 Fed. 574; Woodmance & Hewitt Mfg. Co. v. Williams, 15 C. C. A. 720, 68 Fed. 489; Richardson v. Osborne & Co., 36 C. C. A. 610, 93 Fed. 828; Covert v. Travers Bros. [C. C.] 96 Fed. 568), the decree appealed from is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 F. 1018, 57 C.C.A. 327, 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calhoun-v-southern-cotton-oil-co-ca5-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack