Calhoun v. Patrick
This text of 157 S.E.2d 31 (Calhoun v. Patrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant enumerated error on several grounds, but argued none of them. Thus they were abandoned. Ocmulgee Electric Membership Corp. v. Taylor & Sons, Inc., 115 Ga. App. 44 (5) (153 SE2d 666); Bass v. State, 115 Ga. App. 461 (3) (154 SE2d 770); Zappa v. Higgins, 116 Ga. App. 81 (3) (156 SE2d 521). Appellant did argue, but did not set forth in his enumeration, that the finding of the court, which heard the case without the intervention of a jury, was not authorized by the evidence. Under Sec. 14 of the Appellate Practice Act (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 29 as amended by Ga. L. 1965, pp. 240, 243; Code Ann. § 6-810), this court has no jurisdiction to consider grounds which though argued are not enumerated according to that section.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 S.E.2d 31, 116 Ga. App. 303, 1967 Ga. App. LEXIS 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calhoun-v-patrick-gactapp-1967.