Calhoun v. King

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Calhoun v. King

4 Ky. Op. 105, 1870 Ky. LEXIS 283

DecidedDecember 7, 1870

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Ky. Op. 105 (Calhoun v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Calhoun v. King, 4 Ky. Op. 105, 1870 Ky. LEXIS 283 (Ky. Ct. App. 1870).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Robertson:

The ex parte entry of the motion for a new trial on the motion docket out of court and never prosecuting it in court or having it, with the grounds of it, entered on the minutes on. order book or calling it up for adjudication, was not sufficient to suspend the judgment. And the execution on that judgment Avas therefore legal, and the judgment of the circuit court to that effect ivas consequently right.

Wherefore, the judgment is affirmed, with damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Robertson:

The ex parte entry of the motion for a new trial on the motion docket out of court and never prosecuting it in court or having it, with the grounds of it, entered on the minutes on. order book or calling it up for adjudication, was not sufficient to suspend the judgment. And the execution on that judgment Avas therefore legal, and the judgment of the circuit court to that effect ivas consequently right.

Wherefore, the judgment is affirmed, with damages.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Ky. Op. 105, 1870 Ky. LEXIS 283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calhoun-v-king-kyctapp-1870.