Calhoun v. Gildersleeve

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Calhoun v. Gildersleeve

249 A.D. 856, 292 N.Y.S. 806, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10011

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 29, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D. 856 (Calhoun v. Gildersleeve) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Calhoun v. Gildersleeve, 249 A.D. 856, 292 N.Y.S. 806, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10011 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action brought to recover damages alleged to have resulted from a claimed conspiracy of the defendants, order granting motion of defendant Edith Baker to dismiss as to her the amended complaint upon the ground that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute cause of action, with leave to the plaintiff to serve a second amended complaint on terms, and order directing entry of judgment, entered upon plaintiff’s failure to comply with those terms, and judgment entered thereon, dismissing the complaint as to defendant Edith Baker, with costs of the action, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present ■—■ Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action brought to recover damages alleged to have resulted from a claimed conspiracy of the defendants, order granting motion of defendant Edith Baker to dismiss as to her the amended complaint upon the ground that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute cause of action, with leave to the plaintiff to serve a second amended complaint on terms, and order directing entry of judgment, entered upon plaintiff’s failure to comply with those terms, and judgment entered thereon, dismissing the complaint as to defendant Edith Baker, with costs of the action, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present ■—■ Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D. 856, 292 N.Y.S. 806, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calhoun-v-gildersleeve-nyappdiv-1937.