Calhoun v. Currie
This text of 176 S.E. 324 (Calhoun v. Currie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The respondent obtained from Magistrate Ereeman a rule requiring the appellants to show cause why they should not be ejected from certain premises. For return to the rule to show cause issued by the magistrate, the appellants set up claim of title to the real estate in dispute. The magistrate held that he was without authority to determine the question *433 of title, and that he, therefore, had no jurisdiction of the proceeding, and dismissed it. On appeal to the Circuit Court, Judge H. F. Rice reversed the action of the magistrate in an order which is satisfactory to this Court. Let it be reported.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 S.E. 324, 173 S.C. 429, 1934 S.C. LEXIS 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calhoun-v-currie-sc-1934.