Calhoun v. Currie

176 S.E. 324, 173 S.C. 429, 1934 S.C. LEXIS 167
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedOctober 2, 1934
Docket13916
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 176 S.E. 324 (Calhoun v. Currie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Calhoun v. Currie, 176 S.E. 324, 173 S.C. 429, 1934 S.C. LEXIS 167 (S.C. 1934).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonham.

The respondent obtained from Magistrate Ereeman a rule requiring the appellants to show cause why they should not be ejected from certain premises. For return to the rule to show cause issued by the magistrate, the appellants set up claim of title to the real estate in dispute. The magistrate held that he was without authority to determine the question *433 of title, and that he, therefore, had no jurisdiction of the proceeding, and dismissed it. On appeal to the Circuit Court, Judge H. F. Rice reversed the action of the magistrate in an order which is satisfactory to this Court. Let it be reported.

The appeal is dismissed.

Mr. Chiee Justice BlEase, Messrs. Justices Stabler and Carter and Mr. Acting Associate Justice W. C. Cothran concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lund v. Gray Line Water Tours, Inc.
289 S.E.2d 404 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 S.E. 324, 173 S.C. 429, 1934 S.C. LEXIS 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calhoun-v-currie-sc-1934.