Calhoun v. Calhoun

Ohio Court of Appeals

Calhoun v. Calhoun

29 Ohio Law. Abs. 670, 1939 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 963

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 23, 1939

DocketNo 3067

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 29 Ohio Law. Abs. 670 (Calhoun v. Calhoun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Calhoun v. Calhoun, 29 Ohio Law. Abs. 670, 1939 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 963 (Ohio Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

BY THE COURT:

• Submitted on motion of appellant for order allowing additional expense money for preparation of transcript of testimony and for attorneys’ fees for the prosecution and perfection of the appeal and upon motion of appellee to strike appellant’s motion, for the reason that the Court is without jurisdiction to grant the same.

■ It is our judgment that §11994, GC, authorizes -the relief requested in appellant’s motion. Of course we would not allow any support money to appellant because that has been taken care of in the permanent decree below, and it is to be presumed that the defendant will observe it. The appeal does not ■ supersede the judgment, as it is on questions of law only and no super sedeas bond has been given.

We will require the plaintiff to post $35.00 with the Clerk of this Court for stenographic fees incident to the preparation of a Bill of Exceptions or secure the fees to be paid, and $25.00 on or before September 5th to appellant for .her attorneys’ fees.

The motion of appellee will be overruled.

HORNBECK, PJ, GEIGER & BARNES, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI