Calhoun v. Calhoun

256 A.D. 672, 11 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4812
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 21, 1939·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Where the parents of a child are unable to adequately provide for it, a grandparent of sufficient means may be held liable for the support of the grandchild. (Domestic Relations Court Act of City of New York, § 101, subd. 3; § 92, subd. 3. See, also, Public Welfare Law, § 125; Code Crim. Proc. § 914; Rowley v. Fuller, 251 App. Div. 793; affd., 276 N. Y. 519.) However, the evidence here failed to show that appellant, the grandmother of the infant, was of sufficient means to support it and that the parents, who are primarily hable, were unable to provide the necessary support.

[673] For the foregoing reasons the order should be reversed and the proceeding dismissed.

Present — Martin, P. J., TJntebmyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Order unanimously reversed and the proceeding dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Calhoun v. Calhoun, 256 A.D. 672, 11 N.Y.S.2d 415, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4812 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

256 A.D. 672 (Calhoun v. Calhoun) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McManus v. Lollar
36 Misc. 2d 1046 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
McManus v. Anonymous
35 Misc. 2d 265 (New York District Court, 1962)
Gierkont v. Gierkont
134 A.2d 10 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Polansky v. Polansky
285 A.D. 883 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)
Panzo v. Panzo
192 Misc. 989 (New York Family Court, 1948)
In re the Accounting of Tarantino
183 Misc. 288 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1944)
In re the Accounting of McClancy
182 Misc. 866 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1943)
Caplan v. Caplan
177 Misc. 847 (New York Family Court, 1942)
In re the Estate of Kasner
175 Misc. 832 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1941)
Dooley v. Dooley
174 Misc. 10 (New York Family Court, 1940)