Calhoun v. Calhoun

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Calhoun v. Calhoun

627 So. 2d 611, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12504

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 10, 1993

DocketNos. 93-02968, 93-02969

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 627 So. 2d 611 (Calhoun v. Calhoun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Calhoun v. Calhoun, 627 So. 2d 611, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12504 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gail Calhoun petitions this court for a writ of certiorari to review an order of the circuit court which grants the respondent/appellee’s motion for bifurcation of dissolution proceedings and dissolves the parties’ marriage.

We are unable to conclude that the order constitutes a departure from the essential requirements of law and, therefore, deny the petition for certiorari. We also find no abuse of discretion in the circuit court’s granting of respondent/appellee’s motion for reduction of temporary spousal support and affirm that order. Our decision is without prejudice to petitioner/appellant to move the circuit court for modification of the support obligation upon good cause shown.

HALL, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Gail Calhoun petitions this court for a writ of certiorari to review an order of the circuit court which grants the respondent/appellee’s motion for bifurcation of dissolution proceedings and dissolves the parties’ marriage.

We are unable to conclude that the order constitutes a departure from the essential requirements of law and, therefore, deny the petition for certiorari. We also find no abuse of discretion in the circuit court’s granting of respondent/appellee’s motion for reduction of temporary spousal support and affirm that order. Our decision is without prejudice to petitioner/appellant to move the circuit court for modification of the support obligation upon good cause shown.

HALL, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

627 So. 2d 611, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calhoun-v-calhoun-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack