Calhoun-El v. Smith

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: April 15, 2004
• Docket: 03-6972
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6972

JAMES CALHOUN-EL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

ANTONIO X. ENGLISH; RICHARD LAWRENCE-EL; RODMEN LEE,

Plaintiffs,

versus

SEWALL B. SMITH, Warden; KNOWN AND UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS OF THE ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES COMPANY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA- 02-2729-JFM)

Submitted: March 31, 2004 Decided: April 15, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Calhoun-El, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Gloria Wilson Shelton, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

James Calhoun-El appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint, denying

his motion to amend the pleadings, and denying his motion for

appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See English v. Smith, No. CA-02-2729 (D. Md.

filed June 3, 2003; entered June 4, 2003). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -