Calhoun-El v. Maynard
398 F. App'x 914
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Calhoun-El v. Maynard. Read the opinion of the Court — 403 F. App'x 846 →
Opinion
James A. Calhoun-El appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Calhoun-El v. Maynard, No. l:09-cv-03085RDB, 2010 WL 2342384 (D. Md. June 4, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Calhoun-El v. Maynard, 398 F. App'x 914 (4th Cir. 2010).
398 F. App'x 914 (Calhoun-El v. Maynard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Civil action for deprivation of rights
42 U.S.C. § 1983