Calhoun-El v. Kavanagh

Fourth Circuit

Calhoun-El v. Kavanagh

98 F. App'x 961

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 7, 2004·No. No. 03-7542·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James Calhoun-El appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Calhoun-El v. Kavanagh, No. CA-03-4-1-RDB (D.Md. Sept. 12, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

James Calhoun-El appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Calhoun-El v. Kavanagh, No. CA-03-4-1-RDB (D.Md. Sept. 12, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Calhoun-El v. Kavanagh, 98 F. App'x 961 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

98 F. App'x 961 (Calhoun-El v. Kavanagh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related