Caledonian Co. v. Trustees of Hoosick Falls
7 Wend. 508
Opinion
By the Court,
The certiorari ought to have been allowed by this court, and not by a commissioner; but I am inclined to think that the order of this court directing a supplementary return, was a ratification of the act of the commissioner, and an adoption of the writ, so -that it may now be considered as allowed by the court. The motion is therefore denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Caledonian Co. v. Trustees of Hoosick Falls, 7 Wend. 508 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1832).
7 Wend. 508 (Caledonian Co. v. Trustees of Hoosick Falls) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bissell v. Lewis
4 Mich. 450 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1857)
Wilson v. Mayor of New-York
1 Abb. Pr. 4 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1854)
Smith v. Odell
1 Pin. 449 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1844)
People ex rel. Church v. Supervisors of Allegany
15 Wend. 198 (New York Supreme Court, 1836)