Cale v. Byrdwell

305 S.E.2d 468, 166 Ga. App. 901, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2370
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 15, 1983·No. 66213·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Birdsong, Judge.

This is an attempt to appeal a contempt order in an alimony action, which by law is subject to application for discretionary appeal (OCGA § 5-6-35 (Code Ann. § 6-701.1)) to the Supreme Court (Georgia Constitution, Art. VI, Sec. II, Par. IV (Code Ann. § 2-2804)). In fact, the appellant did file application for discretionary appeal of this case to the Supreme Court, and was denied.

Appellant’s contention on simultaneous direct appeal to this court is that the case does not involve alimony but involves “failure to transfer property arising from a jury directed property settlement.” However, the jury specifically designated this property transfer as alimony in a divorce case. The Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction of this case (Georgia Constitution, Art. VI, Sec. II, Par. IV).

Appeal dismissed.

Shulman, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cale v. Byrdwell, 305 S.E.2d 468, 166 Ga. App. 901, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2370 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983).

305 S.E.2d 468 (Cale v. Byrdwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morris v. Surges
670 S.E.2d 84 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2008)