Cale v. Byrdwell

305 S.E.2d 468, 166 Ga. App. 901, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2370
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 15, 1983
Docket66213
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 305 S.E.2d 468 (Cale v. Byrdwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cale v. Byrdwell, 305 S.E.2d 468, 166 Ga. App. 901, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2370 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

Birdsong, Judge.

This is an attempt to appeal a contempt order in an alimony action, which by law is subject to application for discretionary appeal (OCGA § 5-6-35 (Code Ann. § 6-701.1)) to the Supreme Court (Georgia Constitution, Art. VI, Sec. II, Par. IV (Code Ann. § 2-2804)). In fact, the appellant did file application for discretionary appeal of this case to the Supreme Court, and was denied.

Appellant’s contention on simultaneous direct appeal to this court is that the case does not involve alimony but involves “failure to transfer property arising from a jury directed property settlement.” However, the jury specifically designated this property transfer as alimony in a divorce case. The Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction of this case (Georgia Constitution, Art. VI, Sec. II, Par. IV).

Appeal dismissed.

Shulman, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morris v. Surges
670 S.E.2d 84 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
305 S.E.2d 468, 166 Ga. App. 901, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cale-v-byrdwell-gactapp-1983.