Caldwell v. US Casualty Company of New York

129 So. 2d 813, 1961 La. App. LEXIS 1886
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedApril 12, 1961
Docket9380
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 129 So. 2d 813 (Caldwell v. US Casualty Company of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caldwell v. US Casualty Company of New York, 129 So. 2d 813, 1961 La. App. LEXIS 1886 (La. Ct. App. 1961).

Opinion

129 So.2d 813 (1961)

William C. CALDWELL et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
U. S. CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 9380.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

April 12, 1961.
Rehearing Denied May 10, 1961.
Certiorari Denied June 22, 1961.

Campbell, Campbell & Marvin, Minden, for William C. Caldwell, Mrs. Estelle Caldwell, and Speight Caldwell, plaintiffs-appellants.

Jack P. F. Gremillion, Atty. Gen., Carroll Buck, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Ferdinand A. Cashio, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State, defendant-appellee.

Before GLADNEY, AYRES and BOLIN, JJ.

AYRES, Judge.

This is an action by the parents for damages sustained by reason of the death of their son, Buford Caldwell, and by the administrator of his estate for damages for the pain and suffering endured by him during the interval between his injury and his death, and for funeral expenses and other charges resulting from his death and incidental to his interment.

This action is a companion case to that of Fullilove et al. v. U. S. Casualty Company of New York et al., 129 So.2d 816, which arose from the same accident, with which it was consolidated for the purpose of trial, and which has been this day decided.

For the reasons assigned in the opinion in the Fullilove case, all the issues in the instant case have been resolved favorably to plaintiffs and adversely to the defendant, leaving, for consideration, only the question of the quantum of awards of damages which should be made to these plaintiffs.

*814 The facts material to a consideration of this remaining issue may be briefly stated. Buford Caldwell was, at the time of his death, 34 years of age. He was unmarried and left, surviving him, his father and mother, William C. and Estelle Caldwell, and five major brothers and sisters. All except Glenn, the youngest, are married.

There was an unusually strong attachment between Buford and his parents, stemming in part, no doubt, from the fact that he was the "bachelor son," and they were approaching the twilight of their lives. Being a bachelor, his love was centered upon his parents, and was reciprocated.

While Buford worked in Shreveport, for the L. & A. Railway Company, earning approximately $400 per month, it was his custom to spend almost every weekend with his parents in Many, Louisiana. Because the other children had their families, to whom their first allegiance was due, and because he wanted to and felt it his chief responsibility, Buford had, for many years, been the mainstay of the parents.

When Buford was called to the service of his country in 1944, he made an allotment to his mother of $35 per month. Following his discharge in 1946, he began increasing his contributions to his parents for their support to approximately $500 per year. In 1950, Mr. Caldwell became totally disabled, and Buford "became the head of the house" financially—that is, he materially increased his contributions to his parents, bought numerous household appliances, including a refrigerator, water system and washing machine, to make life easier and more pleasant for them; he kept up their insurance, paid their medical bills, bought seeds and fertilizer for their garden, and, more important than any of this, showered upon them that love and devotion which is so vital and important to elderly people who feel, altogether too often, that since they can no longer provide for themselves they are no longer wanted or loved. Buford gave, to these old people, the sense of "being wanted," the feeling that they were important, and that somebody cared, and this feeling of their souls was of infinitely greater worth than all the financial contributions he made— and they were considerable.

He made them the beneficiaries of his insurance, and it is on the proceeds of that insurance that they are principally living today. It is quite true that, since 1953, Mr. Caldwell has drawn a small pension as a disabled veteran of World War I (this pension amounts to $78.75 per month at the present time), but that amount cannot be stretched to cover their bare living expenses.

As a result of this tragedy, these old people have experienced a loss for which no amount of money can compensate. Not only have they lost their chief support, but they have lost the love and devotion of a worthy son. Most probably, never a weekend comes but that their heartache returns with the realization that Buford is not coming home. Through the years, they have had the assurance that, no matter what happened to go wrong during the week, Buford would be home on the weekend and he would fix it. That assurance, and the attachment that formed with it, was extinguished in the unfortunate and fatal accident of June 13, 1958.

As to the injuries which Buford sustained, Dr. Marvin T. Green, speaking of his condition on being brought to the hospital, testified:

"A. He was wholly unconscious and gasping for breath and his face was all bashed in, his nose, his eyes, his mouth, the center of his face was just one large cavity and he was bleeding very profusely and he was also bleeding from the chin, that is, the jawbone had been completely disassociated, it was hanging down to the side and gurgling and blowing out blood as he tried to breathe."

*815 Mercifully, he lived only about two hours. As to whether he was conscious of the pain he was undoubtedly suffering during that period, the doctor did not positively know. Said Dr. Green:

"A. Well, now, I don't think I could say with any degree of certainty that he did nor did not feel any pain. Just because he was so mutilated he would not be able to express pain would not necessarily imply that he didn't feel pain. So I think that would be a little questionable.
"Q. A person in an unconscious state actually has no feeling, isn't that true? A. As I said, he had no way of expressing consciousness and I couldn't say positively whether he was or was not conscious of sensation. He was unconscious in the fact that he could not communicate consciousness, I'll say that much." (Emphasis supplied.)

Thus, although the deceased lived only for a brief period after his accident, he undoubtedly suffered much during that time.

The law is quite clear that the deceased, had he lived, would have had a cause of action for such pain and suffering; that this right of action is a heritable right, transmitted to his beneficiary-heirs on death, and may be the subject of recovery by the administrator of his estate. Reed v. Warren, 172 La. 1082, 136 So. 59; Horrell v. Gulf & Valley Cotton Oil Co., 15 La.App. 603, 131 So. 709; Langenstein v. Reynaud, 13 La.App. 272, 127 So. 764.

Because of the short duration of the suffering, we do not consider the award for this item should be great. We feel that the amount prayed for, $2,000 is a modest demand, and ought to be assessed.

With respect to the award which should be made to Mr. and Mrs. Caldwell, the following factors are pertinent:

1. Deceased was 34 years of age.
2. He was earning approximately $400.00 per month.
3. William C. Caldwell is 69 years of age and has a life expectancy, according to the American Experience Mortality Tables, of nine years.
4. Estelle Caldwell is 64 years of age, with a life expectancy of 12 years.
5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tudor v. Connelly
514 F. Supp. 181 (E.D. Louisiana, 1981)
Walker v. St. Paul Ins. Companies
339 So. 2d 441 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1977)
Temple v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.
330 So. 2d 891 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1976)
Whittington v. Hopfensitz
321 So. 2d 836 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1975)
Succession of Roux v. Guidry
182 So. 2d 109 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1966)
Fullilove v. US Casualty Company of New York
129 So. 2d 816 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 So. 2d 813, 1961 La. App. LEXIS 1886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caldwell-v-us-casualty-company-of-new-york-lactapp-1961.