Caldwell v. State
This text of 103 S.W.2d 758 (Caldwell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
— The offense is theft of turkeys; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for one year.
The testimony introduced by the State is deemed sufficient to have warranted the conclusion of the jury that on the 23rd of December, 1935, appellant stole three turkeys from G. I. Parham. Appellant did not testify and introduced no witnesses.
No bills of exception are brought forward.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 S.W.2d 758, 132 Tex. Crim. 256, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caldwell-v-state-texcrimapp-1937.