Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Caldwell v. State

Caldwell v. State

118 So. 3d 285, 2013 WL 3866770, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11879
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Caldwell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13086 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 26, 2013·No. No. 1D12-5598·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s judgment and sentence, but do so without prejudice to the appellant’s right to file a rule 3.850 or 3.800(a) motion seeking additional credit. [286]*286See Hope v. State, — So.3d-(Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (holding, even if claims were meritorious, appellant did not preserve sentencing claims for appellate review through contemporaneous objection or 3.800 motion).

AFFIRMED.

BENTON, THOMAS, and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caldwell v. State, 118 So. 3d 285, 2013 WL 3866770, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11879 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

118 So. 3d 285 (Caldwell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.