Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Caldwell v. State

Caldwell v. State

579 So. 2d 408, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5095, 1991 WL 84231
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 23, 1991
DocketNo. 89-904
StatusPublished

This text of 579 So. 2d 408 (Caldwell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caldwell v. State, 579 So. 2d 408, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5095, 1991 WL 84231 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Norman Caldwell appeals a final judgment of conviction for grand theft following a jury trial. His sole point on appeal is that his conviction resulted from ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Caldwell’s proper remedy is to file with the trial court a motion under rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. See State v. Barber, 301 So.2d 7 (Fla.1974). We affirm the judgment and sentence without prejudice to the filing of a 3.850 motion with the circuit court.

AFFIRMED.

W. SHARP, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Barber
301 So. 2d 7 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
579 So. 2d 408, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5095, 1991 WL 84231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caldwell-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.