Caldwell v. State

286 So. 2d 27, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6239
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Caldwell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6782
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 27, 1973·No. No. 73-580·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant-appellant was informed against for unlawful sale of cannabis [Fla.Stat. § 404.02, F.S.A.], tried by jury, found guilty, and sentenced to three (3) years in the state penitentiary.

On appeal, appellant contends that the evidence was not sufficient to sustain the conviction for sale of cannabis.

Contrary to appellant’s contention, after a review of the record on appeal we find that the evidence presented to the trial [28]*28court was sufficient to sustain the conviction. Cf. Straub v. United States, 351 F.2d 304 (5th Cir. 1965) and Harris v. State, Fla.App.1969, 229 So.2d 670.

Accordingly, the judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caldwell v. State, 286 So. 2d 27, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6239 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

286 So. 2d 27 (Caldwell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. State
229 So. 2d 670 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)