Caldwell v. State

49 Ala. 34
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 15, 1873
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 49 Ala. 34 (Caldwell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caldwell v. State, 49 Ala. 34 (Ala. 1873).

Opinion

PECK O. J.

— The omission of the word “ county,” as it appears in the body of this indictment, was, manifestly, a mere clerical misprision; but as the name of the county in which the indictment was found is stated in the caption, the omission was no cause of demurrer. Rev. Code, § 4111.

2. An indictment under section 3733 (R. C.) for unlawfully and maliciously disabling or injuring an animal, the property of another, need not state the value of the animal. The said section does not require it, nor does it make the pun- ■ ishment in any manner to depend upon the value of the animal injured; if it did, then it would be necessary to state the value in the indictment. The State v. Goree, 8 Porter, 447.

Let the judgment be affirmed, at the appellant’s cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Worrell v. State
357 So. 2d 373 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1978)
Dunklin v. State
134 Ala. 195 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 Ala. 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caldwell-v-state-ala-1873.