Caldwell v. Petersburg Stone Co.

860 N.E.2d 107, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1212
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 31, 2007
DocketNo. 2006-0184
StatusPublished

This text of 860 N.E.2d 107 (Caldwell v. Petersburg Stone Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caldwell v. Petersburg Stone Co., 860 N.E.2d 107, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1212 (Ohio 2007).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

{¶ 2} The court orders that the opinion of the court of appeals may not be cited as authority except by the parties inter se.

Moyer, C.J., Petree, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. Schrader, Byrd & Companion, P.L.L.C., Frank X. Duff, and John M. Jurco, for appellants and cross-appellees. Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin and James P. Hanratty; and Baker, Dublikar, Beck, Wiley & Matthew and Andrea K. Ziarko, for appellees and cross-appellants. Charles R. Petree, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, was assigned to sit for Resnick, J., whose term ended on January 1, 2007. Cupp, J., whose term began on January 2, 2007, did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
860 N.E.2d 107, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caldwell-v-petersburg-stone-co-ohio-2007.