Caldwell v. Perry & Hylton Inc

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 31, 2006·No. 06-1385·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1385

CHARLES E. CALDWELL,

Petitioner,

versus

PERRY & HYLTON, INCORPORATED; WEST VIRGINIA COAL WORKERS’ PNEUMOCONIOSIS FUND; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (05-684-BLA)

Submitted: October 4, 2006 Decided: October 31, 2006

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harold S. Albertson, Jr., Charleston, West Virginia, for Petitioner. Ashley M. Harman, William S. Mattingly, JACKSON KELLY, PLLC, Morgantown, West Virginia, for Respondent West Virginia CWP Fund, as insurance carrier for Perry & Hylton, Inc.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Charles E. Caldwell seeks review of the Benefits Review

Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s

denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945

(2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s

decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the Board. Caldwell v. Perry & Hylton, Inc., No. 05-684-BLA (BRB

Jan. 23, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caldwell v. Perry & Hylton Inc, (4th Cir. 2006).

Caldwell v. Perry & Hylton Inc (Caldwell v. Perry & Hylton Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 901-945
30 U.S.C. § 901-945
§ 901
30 U.S.C. § 901