Caldwell v. National Gallery of Art
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
___________________________________ ) DAVID L. CALDWELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 12-0406 (BAH) ) NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On March 14, 2012, the defendant removed this action from the Superior Court of the
District of Columbia, and on March 21, 2012, filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. In its
March 23, 2012 Order, the Court advised the plaintiff, among other things, of his obligation to
file an opposition or other response to the motion. Further, that Order expressly warned the
plaintiff that, if he failed to file his opposition by April 27, 2012, the Court would treat the
motion as conceded. To date, the plaintiff neither has filed an opposition nor requested
additional time to do so. The Court will treat the defendant’s motion as conceded and will
dismiss this action.
An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
DATE: May 7, 2012 /s/ Beryl A. Howell BERYL A. HOWELL United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Caldwell v. National Gallery of Art (Caldwell v. National Gallery of Art) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.