Caldwell v. LM SERVICES CORPORATION FOR HDH

345 S.W.3d 394, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1059, 2011 WL 3569401
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 16, 2011
DocketED 96748
StatusPublished

This text of 345 S.W.3d 394 (Caldwell v. LM SERVICES CORPORATION FOR HDH) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caldwell v. LM SERVICES CORPORATION FOR HDH, 345 S.W.3d 394, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1059, 2011 WL 3569401 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

KURT S. ODENWALD, Chief Judge.

Sunshine Caldwell (Claimant) has filed a notice of appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (Commission) decision regarding her claim for unemployment benefits. The appeal is dismissed.

Claimant filed a claim seeking unemployment benefits. A deputy of the Division of Employment Security (Division) concluded Claimant was not entitled to unemployment benefits because she had been discharged from her employment due to aggravated misconduct. Claimant ap *395 pealed to the Appeals Tribunal of the Division, which dismissed her appeal after she failed to participate in the hearing. Claimant filed an application for review with the Commission. On March 1, 2011, the Commission affirmed the Appeals Tribunal’s dismissal. Claimant appealed to this Court.

The Division has filed a motion to dismiss Claimant’s appeal, asserting it is untimely. Claimant has not filed a response to the motion.

Chapter 288, RSMo governs unemployment matters and those procedures outlined for appeal by statute are mandatory. Burch Food Services, Inc. v. Division of Employment Security, 945 S.W.2d 478, 481 (Mo.App. W.D.1997). A notice of appeal to this Court in an unemployment benefits determination is due within twenty days of the Commission’s decision becoming final. Section 288.210, RSMo 2000. The Commission’s decision becomes final ten days after it is mailed to the parties. Section 288.200.2, RSMo 2000.

Here, the Commission mailed its decision to Claimant on March 1, 2011. Therefore, Claimant’s notice of appeal to this Court was due on or before March 31, 2011. Sections 288.200.2, 288.210. Claimant mailed her notice of appeal to the Commission. The postmark on Claimant’s envelope was May 5, 2011. Under section 288.240, any notice of appeal is deemed filed “as of the date endorsed by the United States post office on the envelope.... ” Claimant’s notice of appeal was deemed filed on May 5, 2011, which is untimely under section 288.210.

Chapter 288 sets forth stringent guidelines for the filing of the notice of appeal and makes no provision for filing a late notice of appeal. Martinez v. Lea-Ed, Inc., 155 S.W.3d 809, 810 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). The provisions for a special order for late notice of appeal as set forth in Supreme Court Rule 81.07 do not apply to special statutory proceedings, such as unemployment claims governed by Chapter 288. See, Holmes v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc., 488 S.W.2d 311, 314-15 (Mo.App.1972). Because Claimant’s notice of appeal was untimely under Chapter 288, our only recourse is to dismiss Claimant’s appeal.

The Division’s motion to dismiss is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martinez v. Lea-Ed, Inc.
155 S.W.3d 809 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)
Holmes v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.
488 S.W.2d 311 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1972)
Burch Food Services, Inc. v. Missouri Division of Employment Security
945 S.W.2d 478 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
345 S.W.3d 394, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1059, 2011 WL 3569401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caldwell-v-lm-services-corporation-for-hdh-moctapp-2011.