Caldwell v. Kernodle
This text of 34 Ind. 424 (Caldwell v. Kernodle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action was brought by the appellant [425]*425against the appellee on two promissory notes, amounting at the time of the trial to about four hundred and twenty-five dollars.
The defense set up was an account against the intestate which amounted to about six hundred and eightyvfive dollars. There was no controversy about the correctness of the notes, while as to some portions of the set-off there were grave doubts as to their correctness. The jury found a verdict for the defendant for six hundred and eighty-four dollars.
It is quite evident from the record that the jury failed to allow the plaintiff the amount of the notes, else they could not have found so much due to the defendant.
There having been a motion for a new trial, and the proper exception taken, we must reverse the judgment.
The judgment is reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 Ind. 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caldwell-v-kernodle-ind-1870.