Caldwell v. Kelley
This text of 668 F. App'x 677 (Caldwell v. Kelley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Arkansas inmate John Caldwell appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 [678]*678action. Viewing the summary judgment record in a light most favorable to Mr. Caldwell, and drawing all reasonable inferences from it in his favor, see Murchison v. Rogers, 779 F.3d 882, 886-87 (8th Cir. 2015), we find no basis for overturning the district court’s determination that there were no jury issues on his Eighth Amendment claims, see Allard v. Baldwin, 779 F.3d 768, 771-72 (8th Cir.) (discussing requirements to prevail on Eighth Amendment claim), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 211, 193 L.Ed.2d 162 (2015). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
668 F. App'x 677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caldwell-v-kelley-ca8-2016.