Caldwell v. Kelley

668 F. App'x 677
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 2, 2016
DocketNo. 15-3323
StatusPublished

This text of 668 F. App'x 677 (Caldwell v. Kelley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caldwell v. Kelley, 668 F. App'x 677 (8th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate John Caldwell appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 [678]*678action. Viewing the summary judgment record in a light most favorable to Mr. Caldwell, and drawing all reasonable inferences from it in his favor, see Murchison v. Rogers, 779 F.3d 882, 886-87 (8th Cir. 2015), we find no basis for overturning the district court’s determination that there were no jury issues on his Eighth Amendment claims, see Allard v. Baldwin, 779 F.3d 768, 771-72 (8th Cir.) (discussing requirements to prevail on Eighth Amendment claim), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 211, 193 L.Ed.2d 162 (2015). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John Allard v. Tonia Baldwin
779 F.3d 768 (Eighth Circuit, 2015)
Joseph Murchison v. John Rogers
779 F.3d 882 (Eighth Circuit, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
668 F. App'x 677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caldwell-v-kelley-ca8-2016.