Caldwell v. Hahn

277 P. 509, 98 Cal. App. 797, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 682
California Court of Appeal·Decided May 6, 1929·No. Docket No. 5184.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[1] This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment awarding plaintiffs the recovery of one thousand dollars paid by them as commissions to the appellants for representing respondents as purchasers of that property designated as lot 8 in the opinion filed this day in the case of Robson v. Hahn,ante, p. 671 [277 P. 507]. The facts and the law are set forth in that opinion and we deem further discussion unnecessary.

Judgment affirmed.

Works, P.J., and Craig, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on June 4, 1929, and a petition by appellants to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on July 3, 1929.

All the Justices present concurred.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caldwell v. Hahn, 277 P. 509, 98 Cal. App. 797, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 682 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929).

277 P. 509 (Caldwell v. Hahn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tackett v. Croonquist
244 Cal. App. 2d 572 (California Court of Appeal, 1966)