Caldwell v. Hahn

277 P. 509, 98 Cal. App. 797, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 682
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedMay 6, 1929
DocketDocket No. 5184.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 277 P. 509 (Caldwell v. Hahn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caldwell v. Hahn, 277 P. 509, 98 Cal. App. 797, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 682 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

[1] This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment awarding plaintiffs the recovery of one thousand dollars paid by them as commissions to the appellants for representing respondents as purchasers of that property designated as lot 8 in the opinion filed this day in the case of Robson v. Hahn,ante, p. 671 [277 P. 507]. The facts and the law are set forth in that opinion and we deem further discussion unnecessary.

Judgment affirmed.

Works, P.J., and Craig, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on June 4, 1929, and a petition by appellants to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on July 3, 1929.

All the Justices present concurred.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tackett v. Croonquist
244 Cal. App. 2d 572 (California Court of Appeal, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 P. 509, 98 Cal. App. 797, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caldwell-v-hahn-calctapp-1929.