Caldwell v. George

50 So. 631, 96 Miss. 484
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 50 So. 631 (Caldwell v. George) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caldwell v. George, 50 So. 631, 96 Miss. 484 (Mich. 1910).

Opinion

Shith, T.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The streets of a municipality, including the sidewalks, “from side to side and from end to end,” are for the use of the public, and, in the absence of legislative authority, a board of aldermen, or city council, have no power to permit a permanent obstruction thereof. The permission, therefore, given appellee by the board of aldermen to extend his warehouse over the sidewalk in question, was void, and afforded him no protection. It being shown that appellants suffer thereby damage peculiar to them■selves, different from that sustained by the general public, the injunction ought to have been granted as prayed for.

The decree of the court below is reversed, and decree here reinstating the injunction and making same perpetual; costs here and in court below to be paid by appellee.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Cleveland v. Mid-South Associates, LLC
94 So. 3d 1049 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2012)
Caldwell v. George
59 So. 888 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 So. 631, 96 Miss. 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caldwell-v-george-miss-1910.