Caldwell v. Estate of Caldwell

6 N.W. 714, 54 Iowa 456
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedOctober 6, 1880
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 6 N.W. 714 (Caldwell v. Estate of Caldwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caldwell v. Estate of Caldwell, 6 N.W. 714, 54 Iowa 456 (iowa 1880).

Opinion

Adams, Cu. J.

i. estate : widow^tiscourt. The application was made under section 2375 of the Code, which is in these words: “The court shall, if necessary, set off to the widow, and children under fifteen years of age, of the decedent, sufficient of his property, of such kind as it shall deem appropriate, to support them for twelve months from the time of his death.”

The plaintiff insists that under the facts of this case an allowance was necessary, within the meaning of the Code. She insists that whether the estate is large or small she and the children under fifteen years of age are entitled to a support from it for twelve months, if they have no other resources. It is said that in her inexperience and bereavement she should not be compelled to resort at once to earning money for the support of herself and children under fifteen years of age, if the estate is sufficient to support them, and that the law will not presume that they can live upon credit. We might concede the correctness of this position, and still it would not follow that the court erred in refusing the allowance. The burden was upon the plaintiff to show that the allowance was necessary. It was not shown that the children had no other resources. They may have been the heirs of other property. The plaintiff, while it appears that she had no other property, had other resources. She was administratrix, and entitled to compensation. Now, while we think that the court might properly have made a smalL allowance in addition to her compensation as administratrix, yet, in view of the consideration that courts ought to be exceedingly prudent in this respect, and the further consideration that they must be allowed the exercise of considerable discretion, we do not feel at liberty to interfere.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Estate of Shivvers
34 N.W.2d 632 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1948)
In re the Estate of Dewell
55 N.W. 11 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 N.W. 714, 54 Iowa 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caldwell-v-estate-of-caldwell-iowa-1880.