Caldwell v. . Beatty

68 N.C. 399
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 1873
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 68 N.C. 399 (Caldwell v. . Beatty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caldwell v. . Beatty, 68 N.C. 399 (N.C. 1873).

Opinion

Boyden, J.

This was an application on the part of Caldwell, by way of petition for writs of reeordari and supersedeas; the prayer of the petition was refused by his Honor, Judge Logan, and the defendant appealed to the Supreme Court, and this Court at the last term decided that his Honor was in error in refusing the prayer of the petitioner; *400 and directed a proveciendo to issue to Ms Honor, to the end the prayer of the petitioner be granted.

This proceeding was ex parte and of which Beatty, the plaintiff in. the original actions, had no notice. Such notice was only to be given after the prayer of the petitioner was granted and the writs issued.

It was therefore error in the Clerk to enter up judgment for costs against Beatty; the judgment should have been against Caldwell, the petitioner, for the costs of the Supreme Court. The Clerk will therefore correct the record and enter judgment against the petitioner for the costs in this Court. Should the petitioner finally succeed in defeating the recovery of the plaintiff, Beatty, then he will be entitled to have his costs in this Court taxed against Beatty.

Per Curiam.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weaver v. Vein Mountain Mining Co.
89 N.C. 198 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 N.C. 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caldwell-v-beatty-nc-1873.