Caldwell v. Bauer
238 U.S. 607, 35 S. Ct. 602, 59 L. Ed. 1486, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1391
Opinion
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Yazoo & Miss. R. R. v. Brewer, 231 U. S. 245, 249; Holden Land Co. v. Interstate Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536, 541; (2) Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. v. McDonald, 214 U. S. 191, 193; Seaboard Air Line v. Duvall, 225 U. S. 477, 481; Rowe v. Scott, 233 U. S. 658, 663, 664; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. R. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Caldwell v. Bauer, 238 U.S. 607, 35 S. Ct. 602, 59 L. Ed. 1486, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1391 (1915).
238 U.S. 607 (Caldwell v. Bauer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eustis v. Bolles
150 U.S. 361 (Supreme Court, 1893)
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. McDonald
214 U.S. 191 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Duvall
225 U.S. 477 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. Brewer
231 U.S. 245 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Holden Land & Live Stock Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co.
233 U.S. 536 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Bowe v. Scott
233 U.S. 658 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Cleveland & Pittsburgh Railroad v. City of Cleveland
235 U.S. 50 (Supreme Court, 1914)