Caldwell v. Bauer

Supreme Court

Caldwell v. Bauer

238 U.S. 607, 35 S. Ct. 602, 59 L. Ed. 1486, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1391

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 8, 1915

DocketNo. 171

StatusPublished

This text of 238 U.S. 607 (Caldwell v. Bauer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Caldwell v. Bauer, 238 U.S. 607, 35 S. Ct. 602, 59 L. Ed. 1486, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1391 (1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Yazoo & Miss. R. R. v. Brewer, 231 U. S. 245, 249; Holden Land Co. v. Interstate Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536, 541; (2) Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. v. McDonald, 214 U. S. 191, 193; Seaboard Air Line v. Duvall, 225 U. S. 477, 481; Rowe v. Scott, 233 U. S. 658, 663, 664; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. R. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Yazoo & Miss. R. R. v. Brewer, 231 U. S. 245, 249; Holden Land Co. v. Interstate Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536, 541; (2) Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. v. McDonald, 214 U. S. 191, 193; Seaboard Air Line v. Duvall, 225 U. S. 477, 481; Rowe v. Scott, 233 U. S. 658, 663, 664; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. R. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 U.S. 607, 35 S. Ct. 602, 59 L. Ed. 1486, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caldwell-v-bauer-scotus-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack