Caldwell-Davis Construction Corp. v. Hoover

461 So. 2d 973, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2594, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16687
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 11, 1984·No. No. 84-1371·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A corporate independent contractor which prevails in an action to recover bonuses promised for early completion of a construction project is not entitled to attorney’s fees pursuant to section 448.08, Florida Statutes (1983), which authorizes such fees where an “employee” prevails in an action to recover “unpaid wages.” See Fitch v. Pacific Fidelity Life Insurance Company, 54 Cal.App.3d 140, 126 Cal.Rptr. 445 (1975) (wages as used in a statute refers to compensation for labor performed by an employee rather than by an independent contractor).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caldwell-Davis Construction Corp. v. Hoover, 461 So. 2d 973, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2594, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16687 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

461 So. 2d 973 (Caldwell-Davis Construction Corp. v. Hoover) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Janice Murray v. Playmaker Services, LLC
325 F. App'x 873 (Eleventh Circuit, 2009)
Singer Products, Inc. v. Tecnecol, Ltda.
625 So. 2d 892 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Miller v. Perez
524 So. 2d 1084 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)