Caldwell-Davis Construction Corp. v. Hoover
This text of 461 So. 2d 973 (Caldwell-Davis Construction Corp. v. Hoover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A corporate independent contractor which prevails in an action to recover bonuses promised for early completion of a construction project is not entitled to attorney’s fees pursuant to section 448.08, Florida Statutes (1983), which authorizes such fees where an “employee” prevails in an action to recover “unpaid wages.” See Fitch v. Pacific Fidelity Life Insurance Company, 54 Cal.App.3d 140, 126 Cal.Rptr. 445 (1975) (wages as used in a statute refers to compensation for labor performed by an employee rather than by an independent contractor).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
461 So. 2d 973, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2594, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caldwell-davis-construction-corp-v-hoover-fladistctapp-1984.