Caldor, Inc., No. 30 v. Town of Ramapo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Caldor, Inc., No. 30 v. Town of Ramapo

247 A.D.2d 537, 668 N.Y.S.2d 478, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1509

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 17, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 247 A.D.2d 537 (Caldor, Inc., No. 30 v. Town of Ramapo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Caldor, Inc., No. 30 v. Town of Ramapo, 247 A.D.2d 537, 668 N.Y.S.2d 478, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1509 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

In a [538]*538proceeding pursuant to Real Property Tax Law article 7, the Town of Ramapo, the Board of Assessors, and the Board of Assessment Review of the Town of Ramapo appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Palella, J.), entered April 23, 1997, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 3216 to dismiss the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly determined that the appellants were not entitled to dismissal of this proceeding for the failure of the petitioner to file a note of issue pursuant to CPLR 3216 (b) (see, Matter of Board of Mgrs. v Town of Ramapo, 247 AD2d 537 [decided herewith]).

Miller, J. P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a [538]*538proceeding pursuant to Real Property Tax Law article 7, the Town of Ramapo, the Board of Assessors, and the Board of Assessment Review of the Town of Ramapo appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Palella, J.), entered April 23, 1997, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 3216 to dismiss the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly determined that the appellants were not entitled to dismissal of this proceeding for the failure of the petitioner to file a note of issue pursuant to CPLR 3216 (b) (see, Matter of Board of Mgrs. v Town of Ramapo, 247 AD2d 537 [decided herewith]).

Miller, J. P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 A.D.2d 537, 668 N.Y.S.2d 478, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caldor-inc-no-30-v-town-of-ramapo-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack