Calderon v. Calderon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Calderon v. Calderon

59 A.D.3d 579, 872 N.Y.S.2d 678

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 17, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 59 A.D.3d 579 (Calderon v. Calderon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Calderon v. Calderon, 59 A.D.3d 579, 872 N.Y.S.2d 678 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to impose a constructive trust upon certain real property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Martin, J.), dated March 2, 2007, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the particular circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly determined that the defendant was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs causes of action to impose a constructive trust or equitable lien on the subject real property and to recover damages for unjust enrichment (see Farr v Covert, 34 AD3d 1204 [2006]; Tedesco v Tedesco, 269 AD2d 660, 661 [2000]; Liselli v Liselli, 263 AD2d 468, 469 [1999]).

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit. Skelos, J.E, Covello, Balkin and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to impose a constructive trust upon certain real property, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Martin, J.), dated March 2, 2007, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the particular circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly determined that the defendant was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs causes of action to impose a constructive trust or equitable lien on the subject real property and to recover damages for unjust enrichment (see Farr v Covert, 34 AD3d 1204 [2006]; Tedesco v Tedesco, 269 AD2d 660, 661 [2000]; Liselli v Liselli, 263 AD2d 468, 469 [1999]).

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit. Skelos, J.E, Covello, Balkin and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 A.D.3d 579, 872 N.Y.S.2d 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calderon-v-calderon-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack