Calderon-Lopez v. Ashcroft

Ninth Circuit

Calderon-Lopez v. Ashcroft

78 F. App'x 573

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedOctober 15, 2003

DocketNo. 02-72023

StatusPublished

This text of 78 F. App'x 573 (Calderon-Lopez v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Calderon-Lopez v. Ashcroft, 78 F. App'x 573 (9th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

**

Substantial record evidence supports the conclusion of the Bureau of Immigration Appeals that Petitioner Odilma Calderon-Lopez (“Calderon”) was not persecuted and that the actions taken against her were not “on account of’ any express or implied political opinion. See Ochave v. INS, 254 F.3d 859, 865-66 (9th Cir.2001). In reaching this determination, we do not intend to diminish in any way the seriousness of the events that befell Calderon. Her own testimony, however, establishes no basis upon which to conclude that these events were brought about because of Calderon’s involvement in or association with protected activities.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM

**

Substantial record evidence supports the conclusion of the Bureau of Immigration Appeals that Petitioner Odilma Calderon-Lopez (“Calderon”) was not persecuted and that the actions taken against her were not “on account of’ any express or implied political opinion. See Ochave v. INS, 254 F.3d 859, 865-66 (9th Cir.2001). In reaching this determination, we do not intend to diminish in any way the seriousness of the events that befell Calderon. Her own testimony, however, establishes no basis upon which to conclude that these events were brought about because of Calderon’s involvement in or association with protected activities.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 F. App'x 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calderon-lopez-v-ashcroft-ca9-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack