Calderon, Ex Parte Armando

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 27, 2013
DocketAP-77,006
StatusPublished

This text of Calderon, Ex Parte Armando (Calderon, Ex Parte Armando) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Calderon, Ex Parte Armando, (Tex. 2013).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-77,006

EX PARTE ARMANDO CALDERON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1242716 IN THE 176TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant entered an open plea of guilty to

possession of a controlled substance, and was sentenced pursuant to Section 12.44(a) of the Texas

Penal Code to sixty days’ county jail imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel

failed to investigate, and failed to adequately advise Applicant regarding the immigration/

deportation consequences of his plea. Applicant entered his plea approximately one week after the

United States Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010). 2

The trial court has determined that trial counsel's performance was deficient in that counsel

did not adequately investigate, and did not correctly advise Applicant regarding the immigration/

deportation consequences of his plea in this case, and that but for counsel’s errors, Applicant would

not have pleaded guilty but would have insisted on going to trial on the charges. Relief is granted.

The judgment in Cause No. 1242716 in the 176th District Court of Harris County is set aside, and

Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Harris County to answer the charges as set out

in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within 10 days after the

mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: March 27, 2013 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Padilla v. Kentucky
559 U.S. 356 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Calderon, Ex Parte Armando, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calderon-ex-parte-armando-texcrimapp-2013.