Calder Race Course, Inc. v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation

838 So. 2d 1241, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3063, 2003 WL 882779
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 10, 2003·No. No. 1D02-1244·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants seek review of a final order dismissing their complaint with prejudice, as barred by res judicata and collateral estoppel. Because we conclude that neither the affirmative defense of res judicata nor that of collateral estoppel is conclusively demonstrated within the four corners of the complaint, we hold that it was error to dismiss the complaint with prejudice as barred by either defense. See, e.g., Liv[1242] ingston v. Spires, 481 So.2d 87 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Accordingly, we reverse, and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

BOOTH, WEBSTER and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Calder Race Course, Inc. v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation, 838 So. 2d 1241, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3063, 2003 WL 882779 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

838 So. 2d 1241 (Calder Race Course, Inc. v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

May v. Salter
139 So. 3d 375 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)