Calcagno v. New York City Transit Authority
738 N.E.2d 358, 95 N.Y.2d 875, 715 N.Y.S.2d 211, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 3941
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (273 AD2d 334).
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Calcagno v. New York City Transit Authority, 738 N.E.2d 358, 95 N.Y.2d 875, 715 N.Y.S.2d 211, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 3941 (N.Y. 2000).
738 N.E.2d 358 (Calcagno v. New York City Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wilson v. REDDY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
737 N.E.2d 950 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)