Calandra v. Rothwax
This text of 93 A.D.2d 766 (Calandra v. Rothwax) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Application for a writ of prohibition unanimously denied, the cross motion granted and the petition dismissed, in the exercise of discretion, without costs and without disbursements. It does not appear that there is a clear legal right to the remedy of prohibition and the matter is reviewable upon appeal. (Cf. Matter of Dondi v Jones, 40 NY2d 8, 13.) No opinion. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Silverman, Lynch and Milonas, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 A.D.2d 766, 461 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calandra-v-rothwax-nyappdiv-1983.