Calandra v. Rothwax
93 A.D.2d 766, 461 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17602
Opinion
—Application for a writ of prohibition unanimously denied, the cross motion granted and the petition dismissed, in the exercise of discretion, without costs and without disbursements. It does not appear that there is a clear legal right to the remedy of prohibition and the matter is reviewable upon appeal. (Cf. Matter of Dondi v Jones, 40 NY2d 8, 13.) No opinion. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Silverman, Lynch and Milonas, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Calandra v. Rothwax, 93 A.D.2d 766, 461 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17602 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).
93 A.D.2d 766 (Calandra v. Rothwax) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dondi v. Jones
351 N.E.2d 650 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)