Calamco v. J.R. Simplot Co.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided July 18, 2023·No. 2:21-cv-01201·Unknown

Opinion

Hal Michael Clyde (SBN CA 302473) MClyde@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP 3150 Porter Drive Palo Alto, California 94304-1212 Telephone: 650.838.4300 Facsimile: 650.838.4350 Donald J. Kula, Bar No. 144342 DKula@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP 1888 Century Park East, Suite 1700 Los Angeles, California 90067-1721 Telephone: +1.310.788.9900 Facsimile: +1.310.788.3399 Attorneys for Defendant J.R. Simplot Company

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CALAMCO, a California Corporation, Case No. 2:21-cv-01201-KJM-KJN Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER v. J.R. Simplot Company and DOES 1 through 10, Defendant.

J.R. Simplot Company Defendant Counter-Claimant, v. CALAMCO, a California Corporation Plaintiff Counter-Claim Defendant.

1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The Court rejected the parties’ initial version of a Stipulated Protective Order finding that it “contain[ed] “no information about the kinds of information to be protected.” (ECF No. 76). The parties have now amended their proposed Stipulated Protective Order as set forth in Section 2.2, below, by adding a description of the kinds of information to be protected. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.2, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), including but not limited to (i) internal financial information of either Party that is not publicly disclosed, (ii) proprietary information on the manner, method or cost of the sourcing and/or manufacturing of products that are sold to third parties by either Party, (iii) customer information maintained by either Party including contact information and history and terms of past purchases, (iv) sales and revenue projections for the product offerings of either Party, (v) manufacturing and shipment details for the product offerings of either Party, (vi) internal business strategies of either Party, (vii) the minutes of executive sessions of CALAMCO board meetings, and (viii) information or records from either Party that would be competitively harmful to the producing Party if publicly disclosed. as their support staff). 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this action. 2.7 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 2.9 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 2.10 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this action. 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 3. SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 4. DURATION Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or retard the case developm

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Calamco v. J.R. Simplot Co., (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Calamco v. J.R. Simplot Co. (Calamco v. J.R. Simplot Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.