Calad v. Cigna Healthcare of Texas Inc.
Opinion
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
The Supreme Court reversed and remanded this panel’s opinion. See Roark v. Humana, Inc., 307 F.3d 298 (5th Cir.2002), reversed sub nom. Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2488, 159 L.Ed.2d 312 (2004). We requested and have received letters from the parties advising of their respective positions regarding the appropriate action to be taken by this court on remand. The parties appear to agree that this litigation is at an end. Plaintiffs Calad and Davila have nonsuited their actions in state court.
Accordingly, the appeals are DISMISSED. All costs are taxed against the plaintiffs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
388 F.3d 167 (Calad v. Cigna Healthcare of Texas Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.