Calabro v. Calabro

133 A.D.2d 604, 519 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51641
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 5, 1987·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

— In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Willen, J.), dated March 24, 1987, which granted the motion of the. plaintiff wife to vacate an untimely jury demand.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The decision of whether or not to relieve the defendant husband of his waiver of the right to a jury trial rested within the sound discretion of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, and we are not prepared, under the circumstances here, to say that the court improvidently exercised its discretion (see, CPLR 4102 [e]; Gonzalez v Concourse Plaza Syndicates, 41 NY2d 414). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Calabro v. Calabro, 133 A.D.2d 604, 519 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51641 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

133 A.D.2d 604 (Calabro v. Calabro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ballinger v. Stelle Architects, PLLC
2019 NY Slip Op 2668 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
CICCO, MICHAEL P. v. DUROLEK, FRED S.
147 A.D.3d 1486 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Buddle v. Buddle
62 A.D.3d 1192 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Scali v. Mancini
255 A.D.2d 435 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Roosa v. Roosa
248 A.D.2d 858 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)