Calabrese v. Vallone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Calabrese v. Vallone

244 A.D.2d 445, 665 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11582

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 17, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 244 A.D.2d 445 (Calabrese v. Vallone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Calabrese v. Vallone, 244 A.D.2d 445, 665 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11582 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), dated August 5, 1996, as granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment to the extent that it deemed the partnership of Vallone & Calabrese to be dissolved.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, he did not raise a suf[446]*446ficient issue of fact to dispute the respondents’ claim that the partnership of Vallone & Calabrese was a partnership at will (see, Prince v O’Brien, 234 AD2d 12; Pace v Perk, 81 AD2d 444).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), dated August 5, 1996, as granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment to the extent that it deemed the partnership of Vallone & Calabrese to be dissolved.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, he did not raise a suf[446]*446ficient issue of fact to dispute the respondents’ claim that the partnership of Vallone & Calabrese was a partnership at will (see, Prince v O’Brien, 234 AD2d 12; Pace v Perk, 81 AD2d 444).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 A.D.2d 445, 665 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calabrese-v-vallone-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack