Calabrese v. James McCreery & Co.

187 Misc. 538, 67 N.Y.S.2d 247, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3219
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedOctober 10, 1946
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 187 Misc. 538 (Calabrese v. James McCreery & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Calabrese v. James McCreery & Co., 187 Misc. 538, 67 N.Y.S.2d 247, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3219 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Memorandum The court erred in refusing to charge as requested by defendant that it owed to the customer the exercise of reasonable care only. On the charge the jury here could have found for plaintiffs simply because the child was attracted to the opening, regardless of whether the place was reasonably safe or the defendant in the exercise of reasonable care could have anticipated a child’s fingers might go into the opening.

The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law and new trial granted, with $30 costs to defendant to abide the event.

MacCrate, Smith and Fennelly, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frein v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
204 Misc. 694 (New York Supreme Court, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 Misc. 538, 67 N.Y.S.2d 247, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calabrese-v-james-mccreery-co-nyappterm-1946.